Rubric: 1.6c Mandatory Use of Skin protection Class Period _____ Date __________
Name(s)		Score:
This analytic rubric is used to verify and evaluate the quality of specific tasks performed when competing this assignment.
Category	Scoring Criteria	Points	Student Evaluation	Teacher Evaluation
Research & Documentation 34 points	Brainstorming table 5.2b is completed: groups Pros and cons on this issue are listed clearly and concisely	10
	Brainstorming table 5.2b contains community feedback from videos (list by number, 12 and occupation)	10
	Additional information questions have been completed (see #3: 13 bulleted questions)	14
Your Position Presentation 46 points	1. Presentation begins by giving some background on skin cancer (What, how, types)	10
	2. Presentations states the position of the group on the proposed statute	6
	3. Presentation includes why the group supports or does not support statue (factual data and reasoning given)	10
	4. Would you make changes to statute or leave it as it is? (why?)	10
	Supporting your stance on this issue: Group is affectively able to answer questions and debate any questions or issues that arise.	10
Presentation quality 10 points	Quality presentation: clear organized and well support, free of errors in construction or use of information (presentation is effective)	10
Analyzing the debate	Completion of H.O. 5.3 - Analyzing the Results of a Public Policy Discussion (this is done after all presentations have been given)	Evaluated separately	--	--
Score	Total Points earned on project	90
Self-evaluation	Students are expected to honestly evaluate their own work. If the difference between the student evaluation and the teacher evaluation is more than 10 points, 5 points will be deducted from the teacher's score when the grade is recorded.